The NCAA Division One settlement was ratified on June 6th ushering in a pro sports type model for collegiate athletics. June 6, 2025 was "D Day" for college sports programs who have to decide by June 15th to either opt in or opt out of the settlement terms.
Here are some key points:
Schools that "opt in" will be able to pay their athletes up to $20.5 million directly from a schools operating budget.
Opting in also allows former Athletes going back to 2016 to file claims against their former schools for NIL compensation they were not able to have access to.
Schools that opt out, must opt out for all sports and do not have to abide by the settlement to pay athletes directly, but athletes are able to accept NIL deals.
There are no limits on scholarships for athletes as long as maximum roster numbers are not exceeded. For D1 Men's Basketball, the maximum roster size is 15.
NIL money can be paid from a University budget, but counts towards the cap of $20.5 million. External NIL money can be offered through legitimate business sponsorships from alums, boosters, or even Investment collectives offering business and revenue generating services. Any amount exceeding $600 to a player will require reporting to a Deloitte external compliance organization for audit and reasonableness. Expect abuses as the rules and oversight are not yet well defined and seriously understaffed. Imagine trying to inspect 364 division one programs each with 30 + sports.....
This changes everything except perhaps the X's and O's of how coaches implement their on court systems. It will change the potential caliber of the players who execute these plays when the best players will be highly paid for their services and play for the more well funded power schools.
It's happening F A S T...Clemson has already formed and funded Clemson Ventures to raise donations and revenues for primarily Clemson Football and Basketball. Duke was ready last season. Estimates are that Cooper Flagg earned $28 million in NIL!
How will smaller schools from smaller conferences compete? IMHO, might not be as daunting as it sounds. IF, the goals are to make NCAA tourneys and build your Brands national reputation benefitting the whole University, it will take more money, but not the $145 million that it takes Alabama to run football. As it stands right now we're not going to be able to buy the 5 star transfers or recruits, but we can, as we have proven find through sharp recruiting 5 star talent for 3 star money.
Some schools are thinking of a Private Equity or Private Credit model where strategic investments in media, facilities, brand, player development and exposure, and advertising are funded using a shared revenue or payback model. There are those who believe that SCU's media profile locally and nationally could be enhanced. How about just a better TV package for games? Maybe we should engage SCU's own on campus Bronco Accelerator to analyze and make recommendations?
Lastly, in the 2026-2027 season, it's possible the WCC may not be as strong and deep as it will be this current year. With the Zags, Washington State, and Oregon State departing, it's an opportunity for SCU to rise in the WCC and contend for league titles and auto bids from winning the WCC tourney. It should be a major goal. Getting to NCAA's in conjunction with investments from the above can be a game changer. With the successes from Women's Soccer, Golf, Softball, and Men's Baseball that all helped earn SCU the Commissioner's Cup as the WCC's top athletic program this season we'll have some kindling. Our last Commissioner's Cup win was 20 years ago.
We'll know more on June 15th. That's the NCAA settlement opt in or opt out deadline for Division 1 schools.